“Confused” residents could be told to recycle fewer items after costing council bosses £500,000 by putting the wrong kind of rubbish in their bins.
BBC News Tyne & Wear has reported the following story:
“Newcastle City Council said it was considering limiting its efforts to a small number of items that are “very clearly able to be recycled”.
The local authority must cover the cost of removing the wrong type of rubbish, such as nappies or food waste.
Contamination can also result in recycling being sent to landfill.
Nick Kemp, cabinet member for the environment, told a scrutiny panel meeting on Thursday: “It is quite a complicated area for something that should be very simple. We are looking at a revised strategy.
“We are looking at potentially identifying a smaller number of items that are very clearly able to be recycled.
“It may mean that more items that could be recycled actually go to landfill, but there would be less contamination.”
In March it was revealed contamination issues cost the authority half a million pounds in 2017/18.”
The above news item was reported on 26 October 2018 by BBC News Tyne & Wear and you can read the story on their website.
Newcastle City Council wants to hear residents views about waste.
The council wishes to gather the views of residents, businesses and stakeholders on how we manage waste in Newcastle.
The following announcement has been made by Newcastle City Council:
“Having asked for residents’ and businesses’ views on our proposed priorities for the Newcastle upon Tyne Waste Strategy in the first stage of our consultation, in this next stage we want to get people’s views about the specific actions we are thinking of taking to ensure that the Waste Strategy Action Plan will deliver the outcomes we want.
The Waste Strategy is being developed based on several key areas:
Please give us your views by taking part in our online survey, before 31 October 2018.”
The above news story was issued by Newcastle City Council and included on the Newcastle City Council website. It has been included here for information and does not necessarily represent the views of High West Jesmond Residents’ Association.
Newcastle City Council is experiencing increased contamination of recyclables. Contaminated items can no longer be sent for recycling this costs the council more money.
This is a worrying development. The council has been imposing more communal bins on areas of the city.
The proposal for communal bins in High West Jesmond remains very unpopular with residents with a recent poll showing that 95% of High West Jesmond residents were AGAINST communal bins.
One of the problems with communal bins is that nobody “owns” the communal bins and this is likely to lead to a increased problems with contamination of recyclables.
In the article below you can read how Newcastle City Council plans to fit “restrictor plates” to communal bins in an attempt to prevent people placing bulky items in them. This will no doubt also make it more difficult for some people to use the communal bins which the council still plans to impose of other areas of the city.
Whilst we agree with the aims for a “greener and cleaner city” referred to in the article below, High West Jesmond Residents’ Association (HWJRA) supports the views of the majority of High West Jesmond residents and HWJRA opposes the introduction of communal bins – the risk of contamination of recyclables being just one of the reasons.
Marginal budgeted savings not realised?
If the recycling rate in Newcastle reduces and it costs the council more to dispose of refuse then it is likely that the marginal budgeted savings put forward in the council budget from the roll out of communal bins will not be realised.
“Every month the City of Newcastle collects approximately 1,620 tonnes of recyclable materials in its blue and communal recycling bin collection, and is heavily reliant on residents putting the right materials in these bins.
In recent months, this collection has seen a worrying development with increasing amounts of non-recyclable materials, such as food waste, nappies, textiles, and black bags of general waste.
They are being incorrectly added to recycling bins, and this is interfering with the recycling process. The City Council is working hard to remind everyone to put the right waste in the right bin – recyclable items only in blue and communal recycling bins and non-recyclable, general waste in the green bins refuse bins.
Council plans more communal bins
The need to recycle properly is being pushed in the build up to the next planned stage of communal bins being rolled out in the coming weeks to some properties in the West End of the city.
The presence of non-recyclable, black bag waste in recycling bins leads to two major difficulties further along in its journey, when it arrives at the O’Brien Waste Recycling Solutions depot in Wallsend.
Recycling waste being rejected for recycling leads to higher costs
It leads to a high percentage of the recycling materials being rejected for recycling. For example, if food waste leaks into newspapers, the paper can’t be recycled and must be disposed of as waste. It also slows down the recycling sorting process as black bags need to be opened and checked by hand, an unpleasant job, especially when nappies and food waste is present. The effect is to lower levels of recycling and increase waste treatment costs.
Recycling rates in England have risen steadily since the early 2000s, peaking at 44.8%. However, in 2015, the rate of recycling fell for the first time to 43.9%. Part of the reason for this fall, particularly in large cities like Newcastle, is the impact of increasing levels of non-recyclable, black bag waste in recycling collections. Another, and almost polar opposite reason, is the amount of good quality recyclable materials being placed in non-recycling refuse bins.
Hopefully the drop in recycling will be an eye opener and encourage more residents to stop and think about their household’s recycling routine.
To give you an idea, in 2016, 19,450 tonnes of mostly recyclable materials were collected in the City’s blue and communal recycling bins. The level of non-recyclable material content in this collection of 1% (just under 200 tonnes) in the previous year, 2015, had risen to nearly 10% (just under 2,000 tonnes) by 2016. At the same time, a worrying amount of good quality recyclable materials was placed in refuse bins. For example, 840 tonnes of metal cans were correctly placed in blue/communal recycling bins, while just a little less than this, 700 tonnes of cans, were incorrectly placed in non-recycling refuse bins.
Restrictor plates to be fitted
One way the City Council is trying to resolve the issue is by adding restrictor plates to new and existing communal bins. The idea behind the plate is to try and discourage people from putting bulky items and black bin bags into the communal recycling bins. The design of the plate – similar to the shape of the London Underground sign – means that residents have to put fewer items into the bin at one time. Trials of the new ‘bin blocker’ plate have proved successful in some parts of the city, where contamination was an issue, which lead to them being introduced on all new bins.
Aim for greener and cleaner city
Cllr Nick Kemp, Newcastle City Council cabinet member for neighbourhoods and regulatory services, said: “The collection and emptying of people’s bins is an important function that helps keep the city ticking over. We introduced communal bins to some back lanes of Newcastle as the Council recognised that something needed to be done to improve the service; and to tackle the issue of excess waste littering the streets.
“Waste contamination of recycling bins is an issue and it’s something that we’re trying to resolve. But instead of it being a short term resolution, we are introducing new methods to ensure the problem doesn’t continue. This includes newly designed bins, education programmes delivered by our enviro-schools and greater targeted enforcement that hits littering and fly-tipping perpetrators in their pockets.
“We will keep preserving with our awareness campaigns and delivering a service that will help Newcastle become a greener and cleaner city.”
Kevin Hawkes, senior operations manager of O’Brien Waste Recycling Solutions said: “O’Brien Waste Recycling Solutions process recyclable materials delivered by Newcastle City Council and North Tyneside Council at our Recycling Facility in Wallsend.
We are seeing high levels of contamination in the form of Domestic Black Bag Waste, Nappies, Textiles and Glass. These materials cause major issues with the recycling process and result in contamination of recyclate sent for further processing.
Quality of material is now more important than ever and we would stress the importance of putting the right material in the right bin.”
Another Newcastle photograph shows the problems with communal bins
Here is another photograph for you, taken on Osborne Avenue’s back lane which shows what the impact of the introduction of communal bins into High West Jesmond could be.
The photograph speaks for itself.
High West Jesmond Residents’ Association strongly opposes the implementation of communal bins in High West Jesmond.
A recent poll of High West Jesmond residents showed that 95% did not support or want communal bins to be introduced. We think it is time for Newcastle City Council to hear the views of the community and abandon its plan to impose communal bins in High West jesmond against residents wishes.
Communal bin issues mount up in Byker, Newcastle upon Tyne
You will read elsewhere on this website the reasons why High West Jesmond Residents’ Association is opposed to the introduction of communal bins in our part of Newcastle and one of the reasons is that there is the potential for the rubbish to pile up – especially as the bins are only emptied once a fortnight.
There has been much discussion on our Facebook page on the subject of communal bins and here we show some recent images from Michael Milor of the impact of rubbish and communal bins elsewhere in Newcastle upon Tyne.
After a recent review of citywide litter bins, Newcastle City Council has announced a planned 13-week programme to replace existing bins.
The review was aimed at identifying ways of improving the current litter storage and collection service across the city.
Newcastle presently has just over 2,100 litter bins and the council review highlighted areas where bins were in disrepair, being under used by the public, or were too small to meet demand.
The change in litter bins will impact High west Jesmond with some bins being replaced with larger bins; some resited; and some potentially fully removed.
800 less litter bins
The amount of bins will be reduced to 800 but the the council says that total capacity for holding litter will only fall by approximately 450 litres as the new stock of bins will be bigger in size.
The council review also identified that in some areas street bins were being misused by traders and householders, who were using them for business and residential purposes. The new bins will initially be emptied weekly but the volume of waste will be monitored on a regular basis.
The city council also delivers the ‘Keep it Clean’ campaign, which is aimed at encouraging behavioural change amongst people who litter, fly-tip and don’t pick up after their pets in Newcastle.
Cllr Nick Kemp, Newcastle City Council cabinet member for Neighbourhoods and Regulatory Services, (pictured above) said: “The new bins will be an asset to the city as the council tries to tackle the litter problem throughout Newcastle. The positioning and locations have been specially chosen using the knowledge gathered from our dedicated collection team – who recognise the litter hotspot areas.
“The new scheme of robust and solid bins makes it a far more effective collection service. The new bins will be located in areas where the most litter is generated, and are larger than the previous street litter bins. All of the efficiency changes are in line with the council’s green city agenda.
“The review was aimed at providing answers to questions that will help us deliver a better service for residents. This coupled with our continued enforcement campaign that looks to deter people from dropping litter in the first place, and penalise those people who don’t care about the community in which they live or visit.”
The old citywide bins, once removed, will be recycled and reused.